Legal Opinion
Belian v. Texas a & M University Corpus Christi
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 7, 1997No. CIV.A. C-95-652PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
JACK, District Judge.
On this day came on to be considered Defendant Texas A & M University, Corpus Christi’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law against Plaintiffs Jane Belian and Valerie Pellegrino. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
I. JURISDICTION
Plaintiffs filed this action in federal court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Plaintiffs were employed by Defendant as Instructors beginning in August 1992. Plaintiffs allege they were told that…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bodenheimer v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Texas v. Crest Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Teneyck v. Omni Shoreham HotelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Allamon v. Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
- Bennett v. Tarrant County College DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022