Legal Opinion

Alexander Ford-Mercury, Inc. v. City of Franklin, Tennessee Board of Zoning Appeals

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 8, 2005No. M2004-00246-COA-R3-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 7, 2005 Session ALEXANDER FORD-MERCURY, INC. v. CITY OF FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE, BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 29830 Donald P. Harris, Chancellor No. M2004-00246-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 8, 2005 This is a zoning case involving a free-standing sign. The plaintiff seeks to replace it with another sign which does not conform to a new sign ordinance. The plaintiff seeks the protection of the grandfather statute. The Chancellor held that the grandfather statute did not apply. We affirm. Tenn. R.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCallen v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  2. 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Rives v. City of ClarksvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. Coe v. City of SeviervilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Lamar Advertising of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API