Order of Aztecs v. Noble
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Milam County Court; John Watson, Judge. Action by W. S. Noble against the Order of Aztecs. Judgment by default for plaintiff, and from the overruling of its motion to set aside the judgment, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
This suit was brought by appel-lee against appellant, alleging that on the 9th of September, 1913, he had been employed by it to solicit insurance for it, which contract expired.on January 1, 1914, and by which it contracted to pay him 60 per cent, of the first 12 monthly assessments of all members secured. He further alleged that in pursuance of said contract of employment he began working for appellant, and continued to do so until about the 1st of November, during which period he devoted his entire time to such employment, expended large sums in advertising said order, and incurred other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bell v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Delaware Ins. Co. v. HuttoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crockett v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- L_ J_ S v. V_ H_ SMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Farmer v. CassityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.