McDonald v. Town of Ludowici
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Liberty superior court — Judge Sheppard. October 14, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtBboyles, J.
1. It will he presumed that a municipal ordinance is valid, and the burden of establishing its invalidity is on the person asserting it. Penal Code, § 1020 (1910); Moore v. Thomasville, ante, 285 (86 S. E. 641), and cases therein cited. In this case the presumption that the ordinance in question was a legal and valid one was not overcome by the evidence introduced. It is not even necessary, on a trial before the mayor or eoüneil of a city, to introduce the town ordinance under which the accused is being tried. The city officials can take judicial cognizance of all ordinances of their own…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Athens v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Moore v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Meeks v. Guckenheimer & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dodys v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Anthony v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Hart v. ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Bell v. City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Jefferson v. City of PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.