Legal Opinion

Pope v. Trotwood-Madison City School District Board of Education

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 29, 2000No. C-3-99-441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. # 18), INSOFAR AS SAID MOTION IS DIRECTED TOWARD COUNT VI OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; STATE-LAW CLAIMS CONTAINED IN COUNTS I, II, III, IV, V, VII, VIII, IX AND X OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING IN STATE COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON COUNT VI OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; TERMINATION ENTRY

RICE, Chief Judge.

This litigation stems from the accidental death of eighth-grade student Lamar Pope, who hit his head on a wall…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brozusky Ex Rel. Brozusky v. Hanover Tp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Greene v. Plano I.S.D.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
  3. Elfers v. VarnauDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
  4. Hinterberger v. Iroquois School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Janet Kena v. Howard County Public Schools, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API