Legal Opinion

in Re Jim Hollis and Christopher Juusola

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 19, 2009No. 03-09-00589-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00589-CV In re Jim Hollis and Christopher Juusola ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators Jim Hollis and Christopher Juusola filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the Buda City Council to submit a recent Council action to the qualified voters of Buda, Texas. Buda’s City Charter provides for a referendum process by which qualified voters may file a petition to have an ordinance passed by the City Council submitted to the voters for approval or disapproval. We have jurisdiction over this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glass v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of Pharr v. TippittTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Weatherford v. City of San Marcos, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. Humphrey v. Balli, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  5. City of Austin v. FindlayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API