Legal Opinion

In Re Protest of Bendelari, Agent

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1921No. 11190PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from ruling of the State Board of Equalization in the matter of the protest of A. E. Bendelari, agent, of gross production tax for 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This controversy arose by A. E. Bendelari, agent, making returns to State Auditor of the amount of gross production of lead and zinc mining ore produced from certain mines for the quarter ending the 1st of April, 1919. The returns embraced 18 separate and distinct leases, and a separate return was made for each lease and included the payment to the State Auditor of the tax as required by section 1, chap. 39, Session Laws 1916, in sums ranging from $12 to $450 upon each lease. At the time of making the return and paying said amounts to the State Auditor notices were filed with the auditor that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Thomas v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Railroad Co. v. PenistonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. New York Life Ins. v. Bd. of Com'rs of Okla. Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API