Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Howerter v. Olson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1945No. 31839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSimmons, C. J.

I concur in the judgment of affirmance. I dissent to that portion of the opinion setting aside the opinion previously adopted in this case. Reference here is made to the earlier opinion for a more detailed recital of the evidence than that contained in the majority opinion.

The majority state that the statement of the case is correct, but disagree with its, conclusions. Two conclusions are set out with which the majority take issue. The majority conclude that there was evidence to go to the jury here as to the questions of plaintiff’s contributory negligence and defendants’ negligence.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Hahn v. DoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Willows v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Varnum v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howerter v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API