Legal Opinion · Dissent

Erdman v. National Indemnity Company

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1966No. 36212Published

1DissentMcCown, J.

I respectfully dissent. Restatement, Conflict of Laws,. § 75, p. Ill, reads: “A state cannot exercise through its courts judicial jurisdiction over a person, although he is subject to the jurisdiction of the state, unless a method of notification is employed which is reasonably calculated to give him knowledge of the attempted exercise of jurisdiction and an opportunity to be heard.”

A court, by proper service of process, acquires jurisdiction over a domestic corporation. It is equally clear that in the field of conflict of laws and judgments, the validity of service of process depends upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brophy v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Roehl v. the Texas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Dillon v. GundersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Liljehorn v. FyfeNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Kron v. J. C. Robinson Seed Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API