Vasquez v. Hillery
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
474 U.S. 254 (1986)
VASQUEZ, WARDEN
v.
HILLERY
No. 84-836.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 15, 1985
Decided January 14, 1986
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
William George Prahl, Supervising Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General.
Clifford Earl Tedmon, by appointment of the Court, 471 U. S. 1002, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · MarshallJustice Marshall
The Warden of San Quentin State Prison asks this Court to retire a doctrine of equal protection…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
3Cases cited77 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Wilks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Wilks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Hubbard (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- (HC) Torres v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.