Legal Opinion
Twenty-Five East 40th Street Restaurant Corp. v. Forbes, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1972PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff has failed to state any evidentiary facts, warranting a trial, to support its allegation that the defendant was motivated by malice in publishing its critique of the plaintiff’s restaurant. (See, e.g., Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., 403 U. S. 29; New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254; Frink v. McEldowney, 29 N Y 2d 720; Kent v. City of Buffalo, 29 N Y 2d 818.)
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
3Cited by18 opinions
- Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Sentinel Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Mr. Chow of New York v. Ste. Jour Azur S.A., Henri Gault and Christian MillauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Meeropol v. NizerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Adams v. Frontier Broadcasting CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.