Legal Opinion
PUNU
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3364PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3364 In re Mark Gerald PUNU, Respondent File A72 423 857 - Houston Decided August 18, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The third prong of the standard for determining whether a conviction exists with regard to deferred adjudications has been eliminated pursuant to section 101(a)(48)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A) (Supp. II 1996). Matter of Ozkok,
19 I&N Dec. 546
(BIA 1988), superseded. (2) A deferred adjudication under article 42.12, § 5 of the Texas Code of Criminal…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- ROLDANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- Mario Roberto Madriz-Alvarado v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Roger D. Piper, Ins Acting District DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Crespo v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- J. M. ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- ABDELGHANYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.