Legal Opinion

Hart v. Thompson's Adm'r

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 27, 1843PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL FROM TUE MADISON CIRCUIT. CHANCERY. Case 131. Allegations of bill and answer,

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ewiwe

delivered the opinion of the CouTt.-Judge BReck did not sit in this case.

Tins case grows out of and is based upon the decision of this Court, affirming the decision of the Circuit Court, in the case of Keziah Thompson vs Peebles’ heirs et al. in which said Plart had filed a cross bill. That decision will be found reported in 6 Dana, 387, in which a history of many of the facts involved in this case will be seen.

After the termination of that case, Nathaniel Hart filed his bill against the heirs and administrator of Lawrence Thompson and of Keziah Thompson, both of whom had died, the former…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  2. Executors of Moffat v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  3. Jackson ex dem. Staats v. StaatsNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  4. Thompson v. Peebles' HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Bradshaw v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Craig's Administrator v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Johnson v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API