Union Pac. R. Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
Section 1, paragraph (18) of the Transportation Act of 1920 forbids a carrier by railroad subject to the Act to undertake the extension of its line of railroad without first obtaining from the Interstate Commerce Commission a certificate of convenience and necessity; paragraph (20) empowers a court of competent jurisdiction at the suit of a party in interest to enjoin any construction contrary to the provisions of paragraph (18); and paragraph (22) provides among other things that the authority of the commission conferred by paragraphs (18) to (21), both inclusive,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Texas & Pac. Ry. v. Gulf, Etc., Ry.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & NavigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Northside Belt Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. P. & PR Co. v. Northern Pac. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1954
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Illinois Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
- Gilmore v. Sandersville RailroadDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1955
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.