Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance v. Bakewell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 10, 1844PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to the Louisville Chancery Court. Insurance. Total loss. Abatement. Salvage.
1Opinion of the Court
¿UD&E Marshall
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The original bill, in this case, was filed by Bakewell, to attach the steam boat, Athenean, then in the port of Louisville, as the property of his non-resident debtor, Farrow, and to subject it to the payment of his debt. By an amended bill, suggesting that the Cincinnati Insurance Company and the Ohio Insurance Company preten. ded some claim to the boat, they were made defendants, and in their answer they claim a lien on the boat, which they say was in possession of their agent when attached.
They say that they had, by two separate policies,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradlie v. the Maryland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Peeks v. Merchants' Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
- Columbian Insurance Company v. Ashby and StriblingSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richelieu & Ontario Navigation Co. v. Boston Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Northwest Transp. Co. v. The ManitobaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1887
- Northwestern Transportation Co. v. Thames & Mersey InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886