Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Longstreath

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1996No. 95-1120; Crim.App. No. 91-0744PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

Appellant was charged with rape, carnal knowledge, sodomy, committing indecent acts with AL, his stepdaughter (10 specifications), committing indecent acts with CL, his natural daughter, and committing indecent acts with SL, also his natural daughter, in violation of Articles 120, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920, 925, and 934, respectively. The military judge granted a defense motion for findings of not guilty of the rape, carnal knowledge, sodomy, and nine of the specifications of committing indecent acts with AL.1 He also…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. DaultonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. Hamdan v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. United States v. MuwwakkilCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API