Lucey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The questions stated in this appeal are whether the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board erred in affirming the referee’s original award of benefits and his award of interest on past-due medical bills and whether the Board erred in its remand to the referee for a recalculation of counsel fees payable to counsel for George Lucey (Claimant). The remaining question is whether the Board erred in affirming a $30,000 recoupment award against Claimant’s future weeMy indemnity and medical benefits.
Claimant filed his claim petition on August 13, 1984 for compensation resulting from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Fahringer, McCarty & Grey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth, Bureau of Worker's Compensation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Frymiare v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.