Averill v. Jackson City Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Jackson; Lane, J., presiding. Ejectment by Nathan K. Averill against the Jackson City Bank. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The sole objection made to the sale in this case is that the notice was not posted in three public places in the ward where the property was located. The defendant is a good-faith purchaser, and has spent a large sum of money in improving the property. The notice was posted in three of the most public places in the city,— one being at the courthouse in the Fourth ward, and just across the street from the First ward, in which the property was located; one at the post-office, also in the Fourth ward, being less than one block from the First ward; and the other at the Hibbard House, in the Fifth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Satcher v. Satcher's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
- Florentine v. BartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Perkins v. FairfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Schaale v. WaseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Osman v. TraphagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blackman v. MulhallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Reason v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- In re Van Syckle's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Wheelock v. LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Mallar v. MallarianMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.