Legal Opinion
Roncker ex rel. Roncker v. Walter
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1983No. 81-3494PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, the plaintiff challenges the placement of her retarded son under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq., (the *1060Act).1 As a condition for receiving federal aid, the Act provides that a free appropriate education must be provided to all children. 20 U.S.C. § 1412. It further requires states to establish “procedures to assure that, to the maximum extent appropriate, handicapped children, including children in public or private institutions or other care facilities, are educated with children who are not handicapped…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Scanlon v. BattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Patricia Sue Battle, by Her Parents and Next Friend June E. Battle and Donald E. Battle and June E. Battle and Donald E. Battle in Their Own Right, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Caryl M. Kline, Secretary of Education, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Education, the Abington School District, Dr. Carl B. Hoffman, Superintendent of the Abington School District, the Woods Schools, Dr. Harold S. Barbour, President of the Woods Schools. Bernard, Natalie, a Minor, by Her Parents and Natural Guardians Bernard, Clara M. And Bernard, Robert A. In Their Own Right, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Kline, Caryl, Secretary of Education, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Education, the Marple Newtown School District, Sanner, Glenn, Superintendent of the Marple Newtown School District, Elwyn Institute, Clard, Dr. Gerald R., President of the Elwyn Institute. Armstrong, Patricia and John, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, Gary Armstrong and Norma H., Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Richard H., on Behalf of Themselves and All Those Similarly Situated v. Kline, Caryl, Secretary of Education of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Individually and in Her Official Capacity, the School District of Philadelphia, Michael Marcase, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the School District of Philadelphia and Arthur W. Thomas, Mrs. Edward Oberholtzer, Augustus Baxter, Mrs. Lawrence Boonin, Robert Sebastian, Mrs. Michael Stack, George Philip Stahl, Jr., and Dr. Nicholas Trolio, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the School District of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Garrity v. GallenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Emily Thomas, Cross-Appellant v. Cincinnati Board of Education, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- P. Ex Rel. Mr. and Mrs. P. v. Newington Bd. of Ed.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Doe v. Board Education Tullahoma City SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Roncker v. WalterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Chuhran v. Walled Lake Consol. SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.