Eichman v. Eichman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*379Littlejohn, Chief Justice:
In this Family Court action, the judge held that the defendant-appellant, Guy Alan Eichman, was barred under the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel from asserting that he was not the father of a six-year-old child, Dave Stephen Eichman, born to his wife plaintiff-respondent, Linda Marie Eichman. We agree with the Family Court Judge and affirm.
The issue was decided as a judgment based on the pleadings. There was before the Court (1) the Complaint, (2) an Answer and Counterclaim, (3) a Reply to the Counterclaim and (4) an Order of the Family Court issued…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wold v. FunderburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neely v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- P. J. Construction Co. v. RollerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Gregory v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Eichman v. EichmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Ward v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985