Legal Opinion

Eichman v. Eichman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 1985No. 22308PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*379Littlejohn, Chief Justice:

In this Family Court action, the judge held that the defendant-appellant, Guy Alan Eichman, was barred under the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel from asserting that he was not the father of a six-year-old child, Dave Stephen Eichman, born to his wife plaintiff-respondent, Linda Marie Eichman. We agree with the Family Court Judge and affirm.

The issue was decided as a judgment based on the pleadings. There was before the Court (1) the Complaint, (2) an Answer and Counterclaim, (3) a Reply to the Counterclaim and (4) an Order of the Family Court issued…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wold v. FunderburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neely v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. P. J. Construction Co. v. RollerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Gregory v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Eichman v. EichmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Ward v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API