Legal Opinion
United States v. James C. Carr (92-3767) and Carmen C. Clair (92-3768)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1993No. 92-3767, 92-3768PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, James C. Carr and Carmen C. Clair, appeal following the judgments and sentences entered against them after they were found guilty by a jury on multiple bank fraud-related charges. On appeal, both defendants present numerous challenges to their convictions, and Carr also raises challenges to his sentence. We conclude that the arguments of both defendants with respect to their convictions are without merit, and therefore affirm the judgments. However, a number of Carr’s challenges to the sentencing procedure are meritorious. We therefore vacate Carr’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Thomas Richard Warner, Michael Charles WardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Jerry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Cross (90-3421) v. Robert A. Williams, (90-3239), Althea Anderson, (90-3305), Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Jay D. Scott, Petitioner-Appellee v. Betty Mitchell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Cox v. TreadwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Michael I. MonusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.