Legal Opinion

Board of Improvement of Paving Improvement District No. 23 v. Matheney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 1934No. 4-3508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

Appellant Paving Improvement District No. 23 of El Dorado was organized in 1927, and immediately thereafter appellee Matheney was employed as attorney for the district. The services rendered and to be rendered bj? the attorney were the usual and ordinary ones consisting of collecting past-due assessments of benefits,, bringing suits to enforce payment of such past-due assessments and representing the district generally in its litigation. Appellee’s contract of employment with appellant district is evidenced by the minutes of the board of date June 4, 1927, and expressly provides compensation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowman Engineering Co. v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Martin v. Street Improvement District No. 349Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board Commissioners Street Improvement District No. 2 v. Delinquent LandsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API