Legal Opinion

Carter v. City of Durango

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Certiorari: Rule to Show Ccmse.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Helm

Carter was duly elected, by the city council, police magistrate of the city of Durango. While engaged in the discharge of his duties, the council, by resolution, removed him and appointed a successor. The present proceeding is brought to quash or annul the action of the council in the premises upon the ground that such action was without jurisdiction.

Under the statute existing at the time of the proceedings recited in the record, the police judge or magistrate, whose appointment was optional with and made by the city council, held his office during the “pleasure” of that body. *536Mills’ Ami.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Aldermen v. DarrowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. People ex rel. Dougan v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Hudson v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Johnson v. Jefferson County Board of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Wright v. GambleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Davidson v. WhitehillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  5. Ellinwood v. City of ReedsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API