Legal Opinion
Montalbano v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 2011No. 37573PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Chief Justice.
This case concerns a permissive appeal from the district court’s interlocutory entry of a protective order, holding that certain documents related to the suspension of Appellant Paul J. Montalbano’s privileges at Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center (SARMC) are not discoverable by Montalba*839no. The interlocutory order comes from Dr. Montalbano’s lawsuit filed against SARMC in district court with ten causes of action including breach of fiduciary duties and defamation; this appeal deals solely with the protective order.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Saint Alphonsus Regional…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Athay v. StaceyIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. SchwartzIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Aardema v. U.S. Dairy Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Eagle Water Co., Inc. v. Roundy Pole Fence Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Judy Nield v. Pocatello Health ServicesIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Keith Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Montalbano v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.