Legal Opinion
United States v. Borow
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 13, 1951No. Crim. A. 10451PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, Chief Judge.
Anticipatory of trial in this matter defendant, Louis S. Borow, filed a motion to dismiss the indictment herein on two grounds: (1) that this court was without jurisdiction to try the offense, presumably in view of the provisions of Article 3, Section 2, Paragraph 3 and of the Sixth Amendment to the Federal Constitution 1 and Rule 18 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C. foil. § 687 2 , and (2) that the indictment failed to contain a sufficient statement of the essential facts of the offense charged.
The latter ground is not strenuously argued. I am…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Reass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herman Krogmann and Emil Klauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. ValentiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Everest Melvin Hupman, Also Known as Melvin E. Hupman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. MischlichDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1970
- John Russell Hanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.