Sabados v. Kiraly
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs in this equity proceeding seek to compel defendant to remove a barricade from a roadway running over defendant’s land. Plaintiffs claim a prescriptive right to use the roadway to get from their land to the public highway. Defendant contends that plaintiffs’ rights have been terminated by abandonment.
The lower court found for plaintiffs, concluding that: (1) the evidence showed mere nonuse and not abandonment; (2) a granted easement may only be lost by intentional abandonment, or adverse use for the prescriptive period by the servient tenement; and (3) prescriptive easements…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foulk v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Eshleman v. Martic TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Hatcher v. ChesnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Lindeman v. LindseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Croyle v. DellapeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Thompson v. Maryland & Pennsylvania Railroad Preservation SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Iorfida v. Mary Robert Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Wysinski v. MazzottaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Philadelphia Musical Academy v. Academy House, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.