Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 2001No. 22, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The question this case presents is whether and, if so, when, the State may proceed with the prosecution of a lesser included offense of a charge that it has specifically nolle prossed. We shall hold that it may do so, but only when, at the time of the entry of the nolle pros, the State has clearly made known its intention to proceed with the lesser offense. We further hold that, in this case, that was not done. Accordingly, we shall affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.

It is well settled in this State that charging an offense for which there are lesser…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Hooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. State v. GriswoldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Simms v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API