Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stubbs

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1901No. 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of San Juan County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

In Angnst, 1892, Stubbs and Jakway brought replevin against George A. Smith, J. T. Smith and W. H. Smith, to recover the possession of certain specific personal property. The sheriff executed the writ by tailing the property into his possession, and thereupon W. H. Smith, as principal, and the appellants herein, as sureties, executed and delivered to the sheriff the following writing obligatory:

*132“ Know all men by these presents, that we, W. H. Smith, E. L. Roberts, Morris Lonergan, Geo. Hemphill and Jos. Bordeleau are held and firmly bound unto Henry Sherman, sheriff of the county of San Juan,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toles v. . AdeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Barnes v. BrookmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Waterman v. FrankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  4. Winne v. Colorado Springs Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1876
  5. Kephart v. People ex rel. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gallafent v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Masinton v. DeanColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. City of Boulder v. Plains Loan, Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  4. Esselstyn v. United States Gold Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. MacKenzie v. PorterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API