Legal Opinion
City of Boulder v. Plains Loan, Realty & Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 3, 1924No. 10,684PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
The defendant in error was plaintiff below. It brought and won a suit in ejectment against the city of Boulder and others. All the others defaulted and the city brings the case here for review.
The plaintiff in error claims the suit was one to quiet title, but it is clearly ejectment both in substance and prayer, and since defendant did not disclaim, the plaintiff did not need to prove possession in defendant, but could maintain the action although the lot in question was vacant. Code 1921, §§ 286 and 296; Bennett v. Rohan, 73 Colo. 551, 554, 216 Pac. 1052. The complaint was in five…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Sweet v. BarnardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Fravert v. FeslerColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Mastin v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City Real Estate, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Fishel v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Santana v. Orcasitas MuñozSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
- Newmyer v. Tax Service Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Pueblo Conservancy District v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.