Piggly Wiggly Yuma Co. v. New York Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, J., pro tem.
The defendant in this action appeals from a judgment on a bond which it issued to plaintiff. On February 25, 1927, defendant issued this bond indemnifying plaintiff against any loss it might sustain after February 9, 1927, by reason of any act of larceny or embezzlement by any of its employees set forth in the schedule attached thereto, of which the employee named in the complaint was one.
On December 23, 1927, the employee was called before a meeting of the officers of plaintiff, where he confessed to a shortage of four small items and made a general statement that, to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Greve v. Echo Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Butte County v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by11 opinions
- Markley v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Four Star Electric, Inc. v. F & H CONSTRUCTIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Mahoney v. Founders' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.