Legal Opinion

Gatewood v. New River Consol. Coal & Coke Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1916No. 1434PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Cross-Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; Edmund Waddill, Jr., Judge. _ _ Suit in equity by John M. Gatewood against the New River Consolidated Coal & Coke Company. From the decree, both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPP, Circuit Judge.

The New River Consolidated Coal & Coke Company, defendant below, is the sales agent of a group of coal mines, some 12 or 14 in number, in the New River district of West Virginia. It does not itself engage in the business of mining or producing coal. In June, 1910, this company made a written contract with one Saunders whereby he became, on a commission basis, “its sole agent in the matter of the.sale of its product at and east of Clifton forge inland and southern coastwise (all government coal not to be included in this agreement).” He had been employed on a salary the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garfield v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Sparks v. Reliable Dayton Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Wier v. American Locomotive Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Marshall v. Canadian Cordage & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  5. Illsley v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API