Legal Opinion
United States v. Gregorio Jaramillo, United States of America v. Michael Eugene Sturdevant
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1975No. 74-1651, 74-1652PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appellees Gregorio Jaramillo and Michael Eugene Sturdevant were charged, by indictment in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, with violating and attempting to violate 18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3). 1 The charges arose out of the occupation of Wounded Knee by members of the American Indian Movement. The case was transferred to the District of Nebraska pursuant to Rule 21(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Trial was to the court. After both sides had rested, the trial judge, by order denominated “JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL,” found the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. John Terrance Garcia, Phillip G. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Red FeatherDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1975
- United States v. Terry Wayne Denson, Stephen Orlando and Joseph James Janish, Defendants- in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. McArthurDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1976
- United States v. Russell Means, United States of America v. Dennis BanksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.