Legal Opinion
United States v. McArthur
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided June 23, 1976No. Crim. Cl-75-27 to Cl-75-34PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VanSICKLE, District Judge.
The Defendants have been indicted for attempting to interfere with United States Marshals and Federal Bureau of Investigation agents at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, during occupation of that village by American Indian Movement members or supporters.
Trial has been set to the Court on a stipulated set of facts. Transfer of the cases to the District of North Dakota was at the request of the Defendants, pursuant to Rule 21(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 1
The indictments are under 18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3), which states:
“Whoever commits or attempts to commit…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Fawaz Yunis, A/K/A NazeehCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Michael A. WolffsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. John Terrance Garcia, Phillip G. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Riley v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.