Legal Opinion
James LIVAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TELEDYNE MOVIBLE OFFSHORE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1979No. 79-1762PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
In this Title VII case Livas alleges that he was fired for racial reasons. Without objection his case was referred for trial to a Magistrate as Special Master under F.R. Civ.P. Rule 53. The order of reference required the master to file findings of fact and conclusions of law. After hearing the master recommended that judgment be entered for defendant. No objections to the findings and conclusions were filed.
On January 15, 1979, the court approved the master’s findings and recommendations and adopted them as its opinion and entered judgment for defendant.
The district court has the obligation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- General Plywood Corp. v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973
- General Plywood Corporation v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
3Cited by15 opinions
- Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In re Shell Oil RefineryDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Benson v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Edward COCKRHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Margaret SPAULDING, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.