Legal Opinion
McMullen v. Synchrony Bank
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 11, 2018No. Civil Action No. 14–1983 (JEB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
As we enter a new year, a top priority is often to get in better shape. Plaintiff Valerie McMullen had that same goal in 2010 and (unlike so many of us) actually followed through. After her favorite trainer left her gym, however, she sought a refund for unused sessions. What she received instead were two bills with new personal-training charges she claims she never incurred. After unsuccessfully trying to straighten out these alleged errors, Plaintiff brought this action against the two creditor banks-Chase and Synchrony-as well as various…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cogdell v. MurphyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- McMullen v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- US Dominion, Inc. v. My Pillow, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Valores Mundiales, S.L. v. Bolivarian Republic of VenezuelaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023