Legal Opinion

National Bank of Tulsa v. Warren

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1955No. 39,461PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to recover taxes paid under protest. Judgment was for plaintiff overruling defendants’ demurrer to the petition. The defendants have appealed.

The petition was in two causes of action. They each raise like questions of law, so the facts with relation to the first one shall be stated.

The petition stated first the incorporation of plaintiff and the identity of the defendant officials; that on September 10, 1953, plaintiff loaned the Oil Equities, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, $1,500,000, and to secure the loan the Oil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Derby Oil Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Gates v. Syndicate Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Ray v. BrushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ingram v. IngramSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Assembly of God v. SangsterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Balcor Pension Investors v v. Wiston XXIV Ltd. (In Re Wiston XXIV Ltd.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  5. Meadowlark Hill, Inc. v. KearnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API