Legal Opinion

Turner v. Fryberger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 1905No. Nos. 14,268—(37)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In the matter of the estate of Jane Robbins, deceased, plaintiff Charles A. Turner, an heir, filed objections to the allowance of defendant’s final account as administrator. The objections being overruled by the probate court for Hennepin county, an appeal was taken to the district court for that county, where the issues were tried before Willard R. Cray, J., who found in favor of defendant. From an order granting a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Appeal was taken to the district court from an order of the probate court of Hennepin county allowing the account of the administrator of the estate of Jane Robbins, deceased.

The facts as found by the trial court are: W. O. Fryberger was appointed administrator with the will annexed, and employed his brother as an attorney for himself, as administrator, and for the estate. Mrs. Robbins left, surviving her, a husband, Nathan J. Robbins, and three children by previous marriages. At the time of her death she was seised and possessed of a house and lot in Minneapolis occupied by her as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Gilbert v. HewetsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Shadewald v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Dartt v. SonnesynSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Donahue v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wootten v. WoottenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Turner v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Rubin v. LaserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Wilson ex rel. Mitchell v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Larson v. Security Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API