Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Horton v. Bourke.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 14, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause is in mandamus and is against the State Board of Health. An amended alternative writ commanded the board to "vacate and annul all of the orders made" by it and pertaining to the revocation of the license of relator to practice medicine and surgery in this State, and to reinstate said license, or to show cause why such should not be done.

We have named in the caption the personnel of the board as would appear from a stipulation filed November 25, 1938, as to substituted appellants. Below, respondent was designated as relator and to avoid confusion we refer to respondent as relator,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Barker v. Kansas City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Porter v. HudsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Snow Steam Pump Works v. HomerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Horton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. State ex rel. McCleary v. AdcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Phillip v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Norval v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Kelley v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Coffman v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. State v. WynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API