Legal Opinion

In Re Mezo Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1985No. 78970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

144 Mich. App. 283 (1985)

375 N.W.2d 416

In re MEZO ESTATE

FLLOK

v.

MEZO

Docket No. 78970.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided July 15, 1985.

Paterson & Paterson (by John S. Paterson), for respondent.

Law Office of W.J. Drillock (by David W. Hearsch), for petitioners.

Before: T.M. BURNS, P.J. and ALLEN and M.J. TALBOT,[*] JJ.

ALLEN, J.

In this matter of first impression we are asked to decide whether the probate court, in the routine settlement of a decedent's estate, has the jurisdiction to hold conveyances of real and personal property void as a fraud on creditors pursuant to § 9(1) of the Uniform…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashbaugh v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wright v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Brownell Realty, Inc v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Eagen v. BrainardMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Fllok v. MezoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noble v. McNerneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. York v. Isabella Bank & TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Noble v. McNerneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API