Legal Opinion

Nemitz v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 19, 1969No. C 68-13PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

On October 16, 1964, the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Bailway (hereinafter referred to as the Nickel Plate) was merged into the Norfolk & Western Bailway (hereinafter referred to as the N & W) with the N & W as the surviving entity. The transaction involved the assumption of control of several smaller lines by the combined company. Among these was the so-called San-dusky Line from Columbus, Ohio, to Sandusky, Ohio, purchased from the Connecting Eailroad which was a subsidiary of the Pennsylvania Eailroad1 (hereinafter referred to as the Pennsy). The Sandusky Line, although legally a separate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Hunkin-Conkey Const. Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Clemens v. Central Railroad Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  2. Turner Ex Rel. Turner v. Liverpool Central SchoolDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
  3. James Chongris v. Hugh A. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. James Chongris v. Hugh A. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API