Legal Opinion

Stoer v. Holtz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1931No. Appeal 380PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

On February 24, 1905, appellant executed and delivered his bond in the sum of $3,000 to one, Tindall, conditioned for the payment of $1500, interest and costs, at the expiration of 5 years; the bond was accompanied by a warrant of attorney authorizing any attorney to appear for him and enter judgment against him for default. As part of the same transaction, he also gave a mortgage on certain premises. Tindall died September 24,1929, leaving a will on which letters testamentary were issued to appellees, executors. They filed their account and, among the assets awarded to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. May's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  3. Erny v. SauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Gilmore v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Fink v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weigand v. Standard Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Krewson v. ErnySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Sweeney v. First Virginia Bank of TidewaterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  4. Forman Building & Loan Ass'n v. Prager, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API