Legal Opinion

State v. Montgomery, 22193 (3-27-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2009No. 22193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Laquan Montgomery appeals from his conviction and sentence on multiple charges including theft of a motor vehicle, aggravated robbery, receiving stolen property, possession of criminal tools, kidnapping, having a weapon while under disability, and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity.

{¶ 2} Montgomery advances four assignments of error on appeal. First, he asserts that his indictment was fatally defective because it omitted the mens rea element for aggravated robbery, kidnapping, and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity. Second, he claims the trial court erred by failing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. SappOhio Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. StargellOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API