Legal Opinion

Rice v. Austin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 29 opinions

This was a proceeding commenced in this court, the nature of which is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Berry, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to be directed to Horace Austin, Governor of this State, commanding him to execute and deliver to the petitioners a deed of certain lands under the provisions of ch. 56, Sp. Laws, 1862, and ch. 140, Sp. Laws 1866. •

By ch. 56, Sp. Laws 1862, certain persons, to whose rights the plaintiffs claim to have succeeded, are appointed commissioners to survey, locate and construct a state road, to facilitate the construction of which ten thousand acres of swamp land, belonging to the state, are appropriated. Section 4 of said chapter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Senate of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  2. Houston Tap & Brazoria Railway Co. v. RandolphTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Pacific Railroad v. GovernorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  4. People ex rel. Billings v. BissellIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  5. State ex rel. Low v. TownsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United Services Life Insurance Company v. DelaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Self-Insurer's Ass'n v. State Industrial CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. State ex rel. Jameson v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Yancey v. HydeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API