Soundboard Association v. United States Federal Trade Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge
Almost every American who owns a telephone has experienced it: The phone rings, you pick up, there is a distinct-pause, and then an automated voice begins to make you an unsolicited sales offer. Such calls, popularly known as “robocalls,” are subject to heavy federal regulation. Generally speaking, a telemarketer cannot direct a robocall to a person unless that person first consents in writing to receipt of the call. Thus, while federal regulations do not absolutely bar robocalls, the written-consent requirement, along with other…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Soundboard Ass'n v. Fed. Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Nio v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Soundboard Association v. United States Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Printing Packaging & Production Workers Union of North America v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Printing Packaging & Production Workers Union of North America v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.