Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2010No. A117526, A118678PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JENKINS, J.

In these consolidated appeals, plaintiff Jennifer Moore (Moore) appeals two orders of the trial court in her ongoing case against Richard Hatfield (Hatfield), financial corporations controlled by Hatfield, and numerous persons holding promissory notes issued by those corporations. In case No. A117526, Moore appeals the judgment entered in favor of respondents, Tomas Hill and E.J. Pean (jointly Hill and Pean), on Moore’s derivative causes of action after the trial court granted Hill and Pean’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. In case No. A118678, Moore appeals the trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Akopyan v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Surfrider Foundation v. California Regional Water Quality Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Arnold v. Loancare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API