Legal Opinion

State v. Preto

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 9, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

51 N.J. Super. 175 (1958)

144 A.2d 19

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

v.

DOMINGOS PRETO, LEROY NEIGHBOUR, CHARLES METZ, HOWARD W. COBBS (WHO IS NAMED AS A CO-CONSPIRATOR, AND NOT AS A CO-DEFENDANT), DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division — Criminal.

Decided July 9, 1958.

Messrs. Ryan and Saros, attorneys for defendant Domingos Preto (Mr. John F. Ryan appearing).

Mr. H. Douglas Stine, prosecutor of the pleas of Union County (Mr. Cuddie E. Davidson, Jr., appearing).

BARGER, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This defendant, by indictment No. 92, January 1955 term, was indicted under two counts. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. State v. JaniecNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. State v. FaulksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  4. State v. MidgeleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Piñero Agosto v. Tribunal Superior de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
  2. Berrie v. BerrieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. State v. RomeoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Ortiz Báez v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
  5. Ortiz Báez v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API