Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This was a conviction for malicious shooting. The technical record only is here on this appeal, and the sole ground of complaint is that the trial Judge sustained a motion of the State to strike from the motion of defendant for a new trial and refused to hear or consider the 6th ground thereof, reading as follows:

“6. The defendant shows to the Court that he was not tried by a jury of twelve good and lawful men and that E. M. Miller was one of the jurors in this case and that the said E. M. Miller was a regular juror in this court and stated upon his voir dire or preliminary examination…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  3. Insurance Cos. v. ScalesTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Weeks v. McNultyTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Stacker v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loeffler v. KjellgrenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  2. State v. KingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  3. State v. McKinneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Smart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  5. Holliston Mills of Tennessee v. McGuffinTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API