Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
This was a conviction for malicious shooting. The technical record only is here on this appeal, and the sole ground of complaint is that the trial Judge sustained a motion of the State to strike from the motion of defendant for a new trial and refused to hear or consider the 6th ground thereof, reading as follows:
“6. The defendant shows to the Court that he was not tried by a jury of twelve good and lawful men and that E. M. Miller was one of the jurors in this case and that the said E. M. Miller was a regular juror in this court and stated upon his voir dire or preliminary examination…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Insurance Cos. v. ScalesTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Weeks v. McNultyTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Stacker v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Loeffler v. KjellgrenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- State v. KingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- State v. McKinneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Smart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
- Holliston Mills of Tennessee v. McGuffinTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.