Legal Opinion
McMaster v. Farmer
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 30, 1994No. 33183-3-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
Robert McMaster appeals the dismissal of his complaint under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). The trial court ruled that McMaster’s claim was barred by UFTA’s extinguishment provision, notwithstanding his contention that he brought the action within 1 year of his discovery of the facts constituting fraud. We affirm.
I
In the fall of 1988, Charles Farmer conveyed his interests in two pieces of real property in Island County to his two sons. The deeds were promptly recorded with the Island County Auditor. Farmer also filed excise tax affidavits with the Island County Treasurer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of Estate of SpeakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- United States v. VellalosDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
- Morris v. Orcas Lime Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Aberdeen Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Freitag v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Giraud v. Quincy Farm and ChemicalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Giraud v. Quincy Farm & ChemicalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Freitag v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.