Legal Opinion

BILLIE JOE BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2019No. SD35659PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division One BILLIE JOE BORSCHNACK, ) ) Movant-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. SD35659 ) STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Filed February 20, 2019 ) Respondent-Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUNKLIN COUNTY Honorable Joe Z. Satterfield REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS Billie Joe Borschnack (“Movant”) sought postconviction relief (“PCR”) by a Rule 29.15 motion and now appeals the motion court’s judgment denying him that relief. 1 The record on appeal establishes that a presumption arose in the motion court proceedings that Movant was abandoned by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  2. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. Travis M. Stanley v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  4. Mark D. Vogl v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. McFadden v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. CORNELIUS JUNIOR HARRIS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Sheila A. Garcia v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API