Legal Opinion

United States v. Norris

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2010No. Criminal Action 03-632PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM 1

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

The Defendant Ian Norris (“Norris”) contends that attorney Sutton Keany (“Keany”) individually represented him while he served as a corporate officer of the Morgan Crucible Company pic (“Morgan”), a British corporation, during the period the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division (the “Antitrust Division”) was investigating Morgan for involvement in a price fixing conspiracy.

Norris argues Keany dually represented him individually and Morgan as a corporation. Morgan has waived the attorney-client privilege. Norris…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
In Re GRAND JURY SUBPOENACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
United States v. Anthony J. CostanzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

United States v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
ODC, Pet v. Cynthia A. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020